European
APRILIA 125
RED ROSE
1990-94,
125cc w/c t/s single, 12hp 70mp2h 55mpg 280lb
Rather odd chopper that harks back to the days when the Fantic
moped ruled the earth. Derestricted motor runs to 27 horses but
doesnt lose reliability. Hard used ones needed attention
to bore/piston around 20,000 miles but 30k aint beyond the
realms of possibility. A sure sign of an engine about to lose
it all is the gearbox jumping out of gear and old ones develop
a somewhat mystical reverence to their electrics. Handling aint
that bad given the custom stance, though quite a few were thrown
down the road.
APRILIA 125
EUROPA
1992-94,
125cc w/c t/s single, 12hp 75mph 55mpg 250lb
Neat, naked stroker that can be derestricted to a mind bending
(given the lack of mass) 35 horses and 100mph! Even in this state
the engine lasts as well as many Jap 125 commuters! Given that
many learners illegally got hold of the 35hp versions, crash damage
is high on the list of checks to make; many thrashed examples
out there. Also, Pegaso version with slightly milder engine but
very rare on the used market. Check discs, linkages and exhaust
for rot.
APRILIA 125
AF1/EXTREMA
1990 on,
125cc w/c t/s single, 12hp 75mph 50mpg 280lb
Race replica hotshot thats largely wasted on the learner
market but goes like hell once derestricted without losing all
of its economy (100mph, 60mpg). Extrema brings in all the goodies
(and the expense) of the bigger stuff, including lack of comfort,
and high price tag. Engines seem to last well for the first 25000
miles then have piston or gearbox hassles but there are some that
have done more than 35000 miles. Pay attention to the electrics,
frame and brakes.
APRILIA 600
TUARAG
1990-93,
560cc OHC single, 35hp 105mph 45mpg 330lb
Tuarag was Rotax engined trailster with tough but uninspiring
motor and excess of poorly styled plastic which could usefully
be torn off as the tubular frames strong and the suspensions
functional, especially on rotted town roads. Poor economys
down to a combination of naff aerodynamics and stilted exhaust/induction;
all of which can be fixed with a little bit of back street bodging.
Rare in the UK but cheap enough, with many Rotax engine bits shared
with other bikes.
APRILIA 650
PEGASO
'94 on,
650cc w/c DOHC single 50hp 110mph 45mpg 350lb
Five valve engine with excess of grunt and character in road chassis
with passing nod to the Dakar replicas. A brilliant hustle in
town and passable on the motorway up to the ton. Was reasonably
priced until Suzuki turned up with the 600 Bandit! The Pegaso
needs narrower bars and a wider fairing; in providing proper hand
protection it would then take over from those old Boxer RS BMWs
as practical wheels perfectly suited to UK roads!
BENELLI 250
2C
1974-81,
232cc t/s twin, 30hp 90mph 55mpg 325lb
Clever piece of stroker twin engineering that burns up the road
very nicely but suffers from the usual Italian electrics; also
suspect alternator and clutch. Chassis is better than rival Japs
of the same era and well up to modern roads. Earlier Roadster
version had 25 horses at a mere 7000 revs, lacked the 2Cs
electronic ignition, and had a drum rather than disc front brake.
Engines ran for 15-30,000 miles depending on abuse. Still the
odd one howling around in reasonable nick but spares are very
hard to find.
BENELLI 250-650
FOURS
254: 79-81,
231cc OHC four,
28hp 90mph 60mpg 270lb
354: 79-81,
349cc OHC four,
38hp 100mph 55mpg 370lb
504: 77-79,
499cc OHC four,
47hp 110mph 50mpg 410lb
654: 80-82,
603cc OHC four,
52hp 112mph 45mpg 420lb
Similar motor to the old Honda CB350/500 fours which begin to
suffer after 25000 miles mostly from the top end, clutch,
gearbox and alternator. The 504 was the most successful of the
series in the UK, the smaller fours rare and the 654 somewhat
fragile. Honda motors will fit into the useful chassis. 254 amazingly lightweight and small for a four cylinder bike. All are
becoming rare, these days, and not really worth going wild over.
BENELLI 650
TORNADO
1973-76,
603cc OHV twin, 50hp 110mph 55mpg 480lb
Big old twin in the British tradition but strangely needed lots
of revs to hustle. Despite primary vibration, the engine often
ran to 50,000 miles with only minor hassles from the primary drive,
clutch and valvegear. Strong frame, taut suspension and useful
drum brakes but chassis rot gets to the petrol tank and exhaust.
Styling lacks the classic status of British bikes. Now rare in
the UK but the odd rough one turns up with ruined electrics and
an excess of rust.
BENELLI 750
SEI
1977-79,
750cc OHC six, 71hp 120mph 45mpg 490lb
Six cylinder piece of madness whose handling defies its width
and weight, superior to most big, bad Jap bikes of the era. Motor
was smooth but gutless, presumably because of the excess of frictional
forces in the engine and low tech two valve combustion chamber.
Though its not impractical its more likely to be viewed
as a venerable classic by collectors than a usable road bike.
Lacks comfort, coherent electrics and long-lived clutch or alternator.
BENELLI 900
SEI
1980-82,
900cc OHC six, 75hp 120mph 45mpg 485lb
Upgrade to the 750 Sei that lost 5lbs, added some much needed
style and improved on the production of torque; overall, a sensible
and useful upgrade to the smaller six. Engines have been known
to run for 30,000 miles without problems, though at any time clutch,
starter motor and valvegear can be troublesome. Smoky or rattly
motors are expensive news and best avoided a sign of a
genuine low milers found in chassis condition, both chrome
and paint often short-lived.
BMW R45/65
79-84,
449/649cc flat twin, 28/50hp 90/110mph 70/50mpg
Relatively light (405lbs), built down to a price boxers that lack
build quality of the earlier twins. Valvegear and pistons often
need attention before 50,000 miles. Some jokers put R45 top ends
on the R65! Also the LS model with shark-like looks but same engine.
R45s cheap (around £750), economical but very slow
but R65 engine or top ends will fit. High milers may have transmission
and even crank hassles.
BMW R60-100
R60:70-78,
599cc flat twin,
38/40hp 95/105mph 60/50mpg
R75:74-78,
750cc flat twin,
50hp 110mph 60mpg 410lb
R80:79-80, 797cc flat twin,
50hp 110mph 50mpg 410lb
R90:74-77,
898cc flat twin,
60/67hp 120/130mph 55/45mpg
R100:77-84, 980cc flat twin,
60/70hp 115/120mph 55/45mpg
Classic twin shock Boxers age well. Later models have better transmission
but poorer economy. R75/80s the best model, especially with
RS fairing, but the good ones are very rare - owners don't want
to sell. R90/100s have weird handling and excess vibes,
engines go after 50,000 miles (smaller bikes can do twice that).
Clutch, timing chain, generator and valvegear likely problems.
BMW R80 MONO/GS
1981-96,
797cc flat twin, 50hp 100/105mph 35/50mpg
Aged Boxer design suffers from poor economy and excess mass (470/500lbs)
but still usable for the long distance stuff. Better gearchange
and less jerky transmission than the older R's but still needs
a learned boot. Old GS trialsters lighter and more fun than
most Boxers but usually thrashed, can die before 40,000 miles
- engines make enough noise to be obvious in their demise. Usual
BMW problems at high mileages, revolve around top ends, pistons,
clutch, timing chain, etc. The odd one has done over 200,000 miles,
when everything from snapping shaft drives to gearbox explosion
is likely.
BMW R100 MONO/GS
1987-96,
980cc flat twin, 60hp 120mph 40mpg 510lbs
RT and RS models replaced by the naked R100R, which aint
quite classical and heavy compared to the old 70s Boxers,
though the gearbox and handling have evolved out of all recognition.
RT/RS remain useful high speed tourers, though the RS has the
better fairing and superior appearance. Both have reasonable longevity,
though occasionally ruined by inconsiderate DRs. R100GSs
hot when equipped with Paralever rear suspension but often thrashed.
BMW F650
'94 on,
650cc w/c DOHC single 50hp 105mph 55mpg 410lb
Good mix of power and torque from Rotax designed, Italian assembled
big thumper, although it could usefully lose the half fairing
and a 100lbs of mass. Secondhand ones are generally mildly used;
more important to look for signs of crash damage than engine ills.
Dealers are demanding silly money for them!
BMW K75
1986-96,
740cc DOHC triple, 75hp, 120mph, 55mpg, 500lbs
Smaller Brick works well as tourer, especially in K75S (125mph,
525lbs) form. Very high mileage examples can suffer from transmission,
injector and top end problems but a 100k viable. K75RT has barn
door fairing, weighs 570lbs, doesnt make much sense. Very
early ones can still be viable despite huge mileages already covered.
BMW K100
1983-94,
987cc DOHC four, 90hp, 130mph, 45mpg, 500lbs
Less impressive than K75, now replaced by the K1100. Heaviness
and ugliness hidden by excellence of its finish and opulence of
its brand name. Early models often had intrusive vibes, odd gearchange
and weird handling. Masses of low rev torque saves it from obscurity.
Neither the RS nor K1 cut it as sportsters. 16 valve head was
introduced in the nineties, gave a touch more performance. Same
problems as K75.
BMW K1100
1992 on,
1100cc DOHC four, 100hp, 130mph, 40mpg, 550lbs
Grand tourer with lots of luxury, safe if uninspiring handling
and BMW quality. LT is tourer heaven, RS slightly more sporting
version. Both have an engine that concentrates on producing the
maximum torque at the lowest revs and have good top gear roll-ons
for ultra-relaxed touring on the open road. Engines well
developed, more sophisticated than the K100. Weight, poor economy
and 70mph speed limits make them a little lost on UK roads.
BMW R850/1100R
1994 on,
850/1100cc flat twin, 75/80hp 120mph 45mpg 520lb
Naked, new tech Boxer with bulbous styling, excessive mass and
advanced Telelever suspension. Width of the engine limits town
madness but sophisticated suspension at both ends allow most bumps
to be absorbed without the usual BMW ducking and diving. 1100R
has major benefit of excess of torque, 850R cheaper. A significant
advance over recent R100s but more attentions needed
to weight saving, though it doesnt show up too much once
under way, thanks to the modern chassis.
BMW R1100 RS/GS
1993 on,
1100cc flat twin, 85/80hp 135/125mph 50/45mpg
Unique new Boxer designs are more or less on the pace, relying
on an excess of torque for their kicks. RS works well in most
conditions except for dense town work when its slowed by
the engine width. GS trailster inspires a different kind of madness.
Both rely on Telever and Paralever suspension to tame long travel
and shaft drive reaction; works exceedingly well for most of the
time. Catalytic converter and ABS brakes are a bit excessive on
a modern motorcycle.
CAGIVA 125
ROADSTER/BLUES
1990-95,
125cc w/c t/s single, 12hp 70mph 70mpg 200lb
Roadsters sensible, naked stroker that handles better than
it looks; a useful update on the 125 Blues. Can be derestricted
to 26 horses, which gives a top speed of over 80mph and some interesting
kicks as it only weighs 200lbs. Old ones have a dubious finish,
odd electrics, seizing calipers and a motor that can be worn out
in 30,000 miles; but nothing that storming the breakers cant
cure, though they are on the rare side. Never made great inroads
into the market despite a competitive price.
CAGIVA 125
SUPER CITY
1992-95,
125cc w/c t/s single, 12hp 70mph 70mpg 200lb
Trail styled street bike that looks smart, handles well on reasonable
tyres and goes fast when derestricted. Quite a few were written
off by keen learners, so a careful check of the chassis is necessary.
Older ones rot after a few British winters, so overall finish
is a good indication of the way its been treated
nonetheless, non-standard paint jobs usually mean its been
crashed. Availability of spares from breakers is poor and nice
ones rare. Seen one fitted with Yamaha motor!
CAGIVA
350/600 W12/16
'93-96,
350/600cc OHC single, 30hp 90mph 60mpg 350lb
Mild, useful trail bikes that thump along for 35000 miles before
any hassles turn up (usually from the ignition or top end). High
miles are indicated by lumpy carburation and poor running at low
revs it doesnt take at all well to radical alterations
to the exhaust or airfilter, either. The 600cc version does vibrate
appreciably more than the smaller bike and worn out examples will
have feet jumping off pegs! Both models are rare, the 350 discontinued
in 1994.
CAGIVA 125
MITO
1992 on,
125cc w/c t/s single, 12hp 75mph 60mpg 280lb
Relatively heavy race replica that had, in its latest stylish
incarnation, Italian fans creaming themselves. The 12hp model
is a bit silly but the derestricted, 30hp version is hot stuff
both in terms of the power it puts down and its handling. However,
the four grand new price is something of a joke and they desperately
need to put the watercooled engine in a naked chassis; 30 horses
and 200lbs being rather more interesting than the race replica
stuff that only makes sense when there are a 100 horses to hand.
CAGIVA 750/900
ELEPHANT
'93 on,
750/900cc OHC V-twin, 60/70hp 115mph 50mpg
Paris Dakar replicas that weigh in at 420lbs (heavier than the
street Ducatis whose engines they share) but less silly
than BMW off-roaders. Styling doesnt inspire but the lusty
engines make them shift in a suitably fearsome manner and handlings
okay. They are occasionally used for the cut and thrust of DR
work, which makes for some interesting times in London
they are tough enough to leave a line of wrecked cars in their
wake. Check for slipping clutches and ign hassles.
CAGIVA 650
ALAZURRA
1988-89,
650cc OHC V-twin, 60hp 115mph 55mpg 400lbs
Rare if not wonderful version of the Pantah that motors along
okay but doesnt really inspire. Usual Ducati engine hassles
but at least spares are easily available and the electrics arent
quite so weird as in some Wop iron. The only high mileage one
the UMGs come across had warped discs, leaking suspension,
rusted chassis and loadsa of oil leaks but still shook windows
in their frames and could see off CX500s, and the like.
Theres no reason to pay serious money for one.
DNEPR 650 II
1986 on,
650cc OHV flat twin, 36hp 90mph 60mpg 475lb
Update on the old Cossack with improved styling and engine components.
Available in a variety of guises, all having an old-fashioned,
functional, funky appearance. You either like this kind of thing
or collapse into hysterical laughter. Old BMW motors can be fitted.
Pay an extra £100 for the sidecar version which is sufficiently
well built to drive through cars and across roundabouts. Plenty
of cheap old ones, plus Cossacks and Ur(in)als.
DUCATI 250-450
SINGLES
67-78,
249/349/436cc OHC single 28/35hp 95/105mph 85mpg
Early 250s werent too reliable and lacked style. 24
Hours had suspect alloy but could hit the ton on a good day. Desmo
version a little faster than the Mk.3 but can wreck the big-ends
and the crank. Useless carb, electrics and exhaust. Can break
legs rather than start if the timings slightly out. 350
best buy but rare. All are agile and gutsy but rigid suspension
and fierce primary vibes make them less than inspiring. Some very
expensive renovations, used spares are rare.
DUCATI 750
1974-78,
748cc OHC V-twin, 50/65hp 110/125mph 50mpg
Old type vee with bevel drive cams, bit of a beast with clunky
gearbox, weak clutch and fragile crank, not to mention self-igniting
electrics and back breaking suspension. Expect a major rebuild
around 25000 miles or earlier if poor oils used. S and SS
versions were hot cafe racers with leading edge handling at the
time, somewhat finicky Desmo motors and the kind of minimalism
that appeals to masochists. Some stock 750 models with SS clothes
at the latters prices, so beware.
DUCATI 860
1977-79,
863cc OHC V-twin, 64hp 120mph 50mpg 450lbs
Bored out version of the 750 with suspect handling and lack of
style. Can run to 50,000 miles. Good workhorse but doesnt
have the guts of other Dukes. Still quite a few on the road, available
at reasonable prices but watch out for crank failure either
at high miles or from using the wrong oil. Later Darmah version
was much more stylish, better handling and less brutish, but some
engines failed within 20,000 miles. Try to avoid bikes that smoke
heavily or have excessive engine noise as they can turn out expensive.
DUCATI 900SS
1977-79,
863cc OHC V-twin, 68hp 130mph 45mpg 425lbs
Vee-twin thats loved and revered by a few fanatics but can
be blown off by any number of modern Jap 600s. Famed for
its handling, which came from ultra stiff suspension and good
geometry rather than any frame excesses, it also had exciting
lumps of torque in typical vee-twin manner. Problems come from
crap electrics, engines that only run on straight oil, difficult
starting and the need for frequent rebuilds. Can be awfully temperamental
when something goes out of adjustment.
DUCATI 500/600
PANTAH
'80-84,
498/583cc OHC V-twin, 48/60hp 115/125mph 50mpg
Vee-twin with belt drive Desmo camshafts (10,000 to 20,000 mile
belt life, valves need shimming every 8000 miles). Pre 82
500s suffer weak gearbox and clutch, later bits can be fitted.
Later bikes are reliable for 50 to 60,000 miles with few problems,
although thrashed examples can ruin their cranks. Nice handler
with relatively supple suspension; electrics are more reliable
than early Dukes. 600TL had economy chassis but same engine as
the Pantah.
DUCATI
INDIANA
1989 on,
749cc OHC V-twin, 50hp 105mph 40mpg 430lbs
Odd looking Duke that showed that their vee-twins only worked
as sportsters. Handling is better than most such devices but that
doesnt say much. Caliper rot, suspension going floppy, clutch
judder and snapping rear chains are some minor hassles to look
out for. It might be possible to fit some more suitable cycle
parts and suspension. Its one of the few Ducatis that
isnt going to make classic status, so it has its uses as
a cheap source of engine parts, but very rare in the UK.
DUCATI M600/900
'93 on,
583/900cc OHC V-twin, 55/73hp 110/120mph 50/60mpg
Amusing retro styled vee-twins with lots of panache but a finish
that doesnt like British winters. The 600s a sweet
running thing (once warmed up) via its updated Pantah engine but
the 900 has all the grunt and guts. Both are full of that elusive
character without having any chronic faults, though older 900s
may have a dodgy clutch and both can suffer malfunctioning ignition
units. Some good discounts on new M600s so dont pay
silly money for one. Many low mileage, summer only examples.
DUCATI 750
SPORT
1988-92,
750cc OHC V-twin, 82hp 135mph 45mpg 410lb
A flashback to the old SS vee-twins, with the same silly riding
position and similar kind of gutsy performance. Handles and performs
even better with the benefit of a bit more civilisation. Looks
tiny alongside some Jap multis and a viable alternative
to the FZR and GSXR multitudes. Check clutch, electrics, front
forks, and engine for bottom or top end noises and oil leaks.
Availability of reasonably priced examples is poor.
DUCATI
750 PASO
1988-92,
750cc OHC V-twin, 80hp 140mph 45mpg 435lb
Fully enclosed bodywork that looks as good as Hondas CBR600
but didnt inspire Ducati loyalists. Suspension not as well
sorted as it should be but any hard ridden bike will have been
upgraded by now. Reliable motor for the first 25000 to 35000 miles
but needs regular oil changes and valve shimming. Age and high
mileage cause poor finish and electrical faults. Competitively
priced with regards to rival Jap replicas and a very useful speed
tool. Availability of nice ones is poor.
DUCATI 906
PASO
'89-92,
906cc w/c OHC V-twin, 85hp 150mph 40mpg 450lb
Watercooled engine, Weber carburation and fully enclosed bodywork
redefined the old Pantah engined series. Alas, the new motors
heavier than the old aircooled unit, probably down to old-fashioned
casting techniques. Complex motor can prove expensive at high
mileages. Better handling than the 750, thanks to superior suspension.
Very heavy on tyres and brake pads, but then most bikes of this
mien are as well. Some very dubious examples out there and the
odd low miler looking for a loving owner.
DUCATI 600/750/900SS
92 on, 583/750/900cc
OHC V-twin, 600: 55hp 120mph, 50mpg 380lb;
750: 60hp 135mph 50mpg 390lb; 900: 75hp 140mph 45mpg 410lb
The 900 version of these bright red cafe racers wins out on everything
except cost, which is close to ridiculous compared to the 600.
The 750s a good bike in its own right; also a touch smoother
and more robust. The 600s okay but the performance doesnt
compensate for the riding position. Check for the usual things
on Ducatis clutch, electrics, oil leaks, general
finish, etc
DUCATI 851/888
90-94,
851/888cc w/c OHC V-twin 100/120hp 160mph 35mpg
High tech Italian vee-twin which reminds one of the old seventies
900SS brilliant when everything worked properly but hell
when something went wrong. This time around there was a lot to
go wrong, including electronic ignition, fuel injection (on the
888) and eight valves. They take quite a lot of owner involvement,
regular servicing and lots of consumables to keep in good fettle.
Some really well loved ones out there but even poor examples fetch
serious money. Avoid anything that knocks, leaks or smokes.
DUCATI 748/916
'94 on
748/900cc w/c OHC V-twin 100/120hp 160mph 35mpg
Hot styling blows the minds of juvenile road testers but it has
the power and handling to back up the looks. Highly impressive
to ride for short periods, the comfort factor may limit long distance
enjoyment. The successor to the old 900SS as far as highway kicks
on the brutal side goes; the 916s quite capable of blowing
away most of the big Jap replicas. Both the 748 and 916 had their
prices cut heavily in 1997, now lots more on the market than before.
JAWA 350
1975 on,
344cc t/s twin, 28hp 80mph 70mpg 350lb
Updated chassis and styling in '94 less of an eyesore. Less likely
to expire from electrical or mechanical problems than earlier
model. Exhaust smoke and engine rattles are normal on the old
stuff. Also sidecar.
LAVERDA 500
1978-84,
497cc DOHC Twin, 48hp 110/100mph 55mpg 410lb
Early Alpinas were faster but less reliable than the later
500T/S. If the Alpina had all the attributes of a good twin it
could also suffer overheating and oil supply problems. Some engines
lasted for only 10,000 miles, others managed 40,000 miles
burns exhaust valves, breaks camchains and wears out pistons if
neglected. Handling was only limited by short-lived, weak swinging
arm bearings. Montuic was racer on the road; fast, fun but troublesome.
LAVERDA
750
1971-76,
750cc OHC twin, GTL: 52hp 110mph 60mpg 480lb;
SF: 65hp 120mph 45mpg 470lb; SFC: 75hp 130mph 45mpg 465lb
Massive vertical twin that in GTL form was mild and odd looking
but engine ultra tough, can run for over 100,000 miles. Top end
first to give problems, crankshaft very strong. SF version faster,
classic looking, troublesome top end after 40,000 miles. Still
many left on the road due to good build quality. SFC was proddie
racer with a lumpy engine that only worked on the open road; very
expensive. Most bikes are high milers.
LAVERDA 1000
1977-81,
981cc DOHC triple, 80/90hp 130/140mph 45/40mpg
3C was relatively mild triple that was often upgraded to harder
Jota. Top end gives trouble first but motor can run from 50 to
100,000 miles. Engine in good conditions fairly smooth,
some heavily used ones go through piston rings rapidly
worth applying a compression tester. Rides heavy going,
needing muscle and long legs. Pre 81 Jotas are wild bikes,
more engine troubles. Also rare 1200 version with less reliability
and more vibes. Most are now owned by dedicated enthusiasts.
LAVERDA 1000
RGS
1982-84,
981cc DOHC triple, 84hp 140mph 45mpg 540lbs
Milder motor with new crankshaft that takes the edge off the Jota
but still quite a handful compared with modern 600s even
though the RGSs the best looking and handling Laverda triple
not quite out of heart attack country when the going gets
tough. Engines typically run to 60,000 miles before needing a
thorough rebuild, top end or gearbox most likely to need attention.
Also Corsa and RGA versions. Getting to be very rare on the road,
now; the older Jotas are the ones with the classic status.
LAVERDA 650
1995 on,
650cc DOHC twin, 70hp 130mph 35mpg 400lbs
An update on the old 500 engine, housed in a modern chassis in
the cafe racer idiom, which suffers from harsh competition from
Ducati. Relatively straightforward twin cylinder engine really
needs to be housed in a Bonnie type chassis and sold on practicality,
but there aint no money in that for a small company. Big
vertical twins are so rare, these days, that almost any incarnation
has to be welcomed and the Laverda seems like an amusing way to
hustle.
MORINI 350
1976-82,
344cc OHV V-twin, 35/42hp 95/105mph 65mpg 350lb
Neat little vee-twin that peaked in the first Sport version, thereafter
lost style, power and performance. Also milder Strada version
that had a much more comfortable stance than the Sport which combined
clip-ons with forward mounted pegs. Handling excellent, first
models had neat double sided drum brake. Highly tuned engine can
blow up when thrashed around 30,000 miles but some made it to
75000 miles. Belt drive for the cams needs replacing every 15000
miles, make sure you fit the correct type. Poor chassis finish
but most refurbished. Most spares still available.
MORINI 500
1979-82,
478cc OHV V-twin, 46hp 110mph 60mpg 350lb
The larger version of the Morini didnt work as well as the
350 but its a useful little bike if used mildly. Some have
been converted to early 350 Sport layout and look all the better
for it. Straight through pipes and modded air-filter make it rather
more interesting on the open road. Engines often need a rebuild
around 20,000 miles if they have been used at all hard. The odd
rat one turns up cheaply, with ruined cosmetics and knocking engine.
MORINI
350 DART
1985-87,
344cc OHV V-twin, 40hp 105mph 50mpg 370lb
The sweet little Morini engine ended its days housed in a stylish,
fully enclosed expanse of GRP but few people bought them. Mainly
because the engine ended up so muted under the noise and emission
regulations that it had lost its edge, the flat cylinder heads
just couldnt cope with modern times. The Dart handled okay,
was relatively comfortable and the engine was quite reliable.
They are very rare in the UK and may, in twenty years time, make
it as a classic on the back of their curiosity value.
MOTO GUZZI
V50
1981-85,
490cc OHV V-twin, 45/50hp 105/110mph 50mpg 350lb
Small vee twin with shaft drive and straightforward pushrod engine.
Agile, lacks the usual Italian temperament except for clunky gearbox
that goes nasty with age. Valvegear in trouble by 30,000 miles,
clutch often burnt out by 20,000 miles. Mk.3 and cafe racer Monza
versions had useful bit of extra power. Monzas tended to
be thrashed which turned them fragile and chassis degraded rapidly
few left on the road. A few years ago there were lots of
rats but now mostly just the odd low miler around.
MOTO GUZZI
V65
1983-85,
643cc OHV V-twin, 50hp 110mph 50mpg 350lb
Upgraded version of the V50 that doesnt inspire but was
popular with mature riders who didnt want a tourer with
excessive mass. Even a torrent of tender loving care did little
to stop the chassis and electrics rotting, everything seemed to
fall apart from the inside out. Some bikes managed 50,000 miles,
others didnt do half that. The whole engine seems to wear
out simultaneously, so what seems like a minor fault may be a
sign of looming expense.
MOTO GUZZI
650 LARIO
1985-87,
643cc OHV V-twin, 60hp 120mph 45mpg 380lb
Uprated V65 engine with more power and tougher internals but still
a somewhat dubious trip if thrashed at speed for long distances
the cylinder heads can overheat and, ultimately, the crank
goes knock-knock. Also gearbox and UJs are trouble spots.
Rare are engines that do over 40,000 miles. Chassis and electrics
were better than many Guzzis, which aint saying much.
When in nice condition its quite a ball to ride but finding
one in such a state is difficult.
MOTO GUZZI
750
1988 on,
746cc OHV V-twin, 40/50hp 110/115mph 40mpg 385lb
V50 design knocked out to the maximum doesnt exactly inspire
as its a long way from leading edge engineering but it is
a compact, light bike that can do most things adequately. Exciting
it aint. Targa version looks neat and the 750T has its uses
as a tourer cum hack. Expect engine problems after 25000 miles
if its been used at all hard, although finish and electrics
have improved over the years. Nevadas mild, almost useful
tourer in custom mode.
MOTO GUZZI
850
1977-84,
844cc OHV V-twin, 65/70hp 120/130mph 45/50mpg
Early Le Mans suffer leaking shaft drive seals, jerky gearbox,
slipping clutch and laughable electrics and finish. Updated with
new fairings and smoother transmission. Mk.3 cant be rebored
and lacks earlier style. Bikes run for 50,000 miles without too
much hassle. Look out for UJs, generator and starter troubles,
and top end demise. Has heavy throttle and clutch, plus shaft
drive reaction in bends. T3/5 much milder devices that can go
for 80,000 miles plus - some went around the clock. Many well
loved machines out there.
MOTO GUZZI
1000 LE MANS
1984-90,
949cc OHV V-twin, 80hp 130mph 40mpg 500lb
Big, agricultural vee twin with heavy throttle, lurching shaft
drive and electrical idiosyncrasies. Thumping torque, general
longevity and ease of maintenance are its saving graces. Avoid
16 inch wheel version (or convert back to 18 inch) as it doesnt
suit the handling at all. Well sorted Le Mans (which includes
suspension upgrade and doing something about the naff riding position)
are worth buying if the price is right. Avoid tuned engines as
reliability suffers. The new 1100 Sport and Daytona have taken
over the Le Mans mantle.
MOTO GUZZI
1000 SPADA
1976-94,
949cc OHV V-twin, 65/75hp 120/130mph 50mpg 500lb
The Spada was Guzzis serious tourer which evolved into the
Spada 3 that had an almost stylish full fairing and was in many
ways their most practical hustle. Alas, they suffer from all the
common Guzzi hassles and problems. They age well under a mild
regime, a few having done 100,000 miles or more. First impressions
will probably not be favourable but those who persevere for a
couple of months tend to fall in love with them. Some nice ones
left out there.
MOTO GUZZI
1000 MILLE/STRADA
1986-95,
949cc OHV V-twin, 75hp 125mph 50mpg 475lb
Neat, naked big vee twin that still has its endearing grumpy nature
and should be looked at by those interested in true retro kicks.
Shaft drive hiatus tamed slightly in recent versions but anything
with over 60,000 miles is likely to have loose UJs. Wiring,
switches, calipers, exhaust and general finish have to be viewed
with suspicion in aged examples and they can end up running very
rough. Owners tend to be mature and sensible so some nice buys
out there if you take the time to track them down.
MOTO GUZZI
1000 CALIFORNIA
1976-95,
949cc OHV V-twin, 75hp 110mph 50mpg 550lb
Harley style Guzzi thats unlikely to send the America company
out of business but lopes along in a weirdly majestic manner.
Generally tough and reliable with just the electrical and UJ blues
to watch out for. Handles well for a custom but is rarely thrashed
thus there are some very old ones that are still working
well, though they do need a lot of polishing to keep their shine.
MOTO GUZZI
1000S
1992-94,
949cc OHV V-twin, 75hp 130mph 50mpg 475lb
Update on the old 750S which was the most stylish of the Guzzis.
Looks to kill for, the rest of the bike is a touch dated in the
Guzzi way but once you get used to the idiosyncrasies it can be
used hard and its generally quite practical. They are rare
on UK roads. Open pipes free up the engine and make a gorgeous
racket, but make sure the jets have been altered. Reasonable used
prices make them something of a bargain but build quality on early
models was questionable.
MZ 125
1978-94,
123cc t/s single, 10hp 60mph 70mpg 240lb
Lacks the 250s build quality and less reliable, but a cheap
way into the learner game, much more reliable and usable than
other Iron Curtain hacks. Available as the Alpine, Delux, ETZ
(with disc brake and sharper, er, styling) or Lux. Also cheap
150 version (65mph and 70mpg) with same naff styling as early
125; engines will swap. Old ones have self-igniting electrics
and exploding gearboxes to add to the amusement. Short-lived but
stylish MZ Saxon version priced itself out of the market in 1994.
MZ 250
1968-90,
243cc t/s single, 20hp 85mph 60mpg 300lb
Huge variation in models: ETS Trophy Sports had unique styling;
TS250 Sport handles and goes well; Supa Five had redesigned motor
and nice styling; ETZ has the best combination of qualities. Drum
brakes not really adequate (use rear brake arm at the front) and
many early bikes went through mains as quickly as Honda V-4s
went through cams. Regulators are a weak spot in the electrics
and gearbox bearings can go at any time. One of the few Iron Curtain
bikes to offer a decent riding experience.
MZ 251
1990-96,
243cc t/s single, 21hp 80mph 65mpg 280lb
In Lux form an extremely ugly motorcycle with usual MZ virtues
and hassles engines will do 20,000 miles before any serious
problems occur. 1993 saw the introduction of the much more attractive
Saxon Tour and Saxon Fun, which are actually good to look at.
Much better value than the 125s and retain MZs much
vaunted ruggedness and practicality. For 95, the Lux and
Saxon Tour fought it out for supremacy, the former sold on a bargain
basement price.
MZ 300
1987-96,
300cc t/s single, 25hp 90mph 50mpg 300lb
Update on the well established 250 had poor economy in pre 93
models. Otherwise quite useful, tough and well braked but not
quite fast enough. Updated in 1993 with Saxon Fun and Tour styling,
with better economy (around 60mpg) whilst retaining full chain
enclosure and long lasting consumables.
MZ 500
1992-96,
494cc OHC single, 34hp 90mph 50mpg 350lb
Rotax engine fitted into 251 chassis with redesigned frame which
is more than up to the job. Early 500R doesnt even make
it as ugly as sin, replaced with the slightly less offensive Silver
Star. Saxon Tour, Fun and Country are much more interesting (from
93 on). Rotax motor generally tough for the first 30,000
miles but some ran on worn out cam belts which did in the top
end. Spares are okay, possible to upgrade the motor into more
powerful form.
MuZ 660 SKORPION
'95-96,
660cc w/c OHC single, 50hp 110mph 50mpg 380lb
Yamaha XTZ660s engine housed in interesting and stylish
chassis shows some promise alas, MZ havent gone out
of their way to make the running costs minimal. Not very many
on the secondhand market as highly priced when new. Engine should
be tough and durable but the odd silliness with the oil tubing
run and general build quality.
copyright: (c) 2008 GoodMotorcycles.com